BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Deng H, Wang YQ, Sun YF, Zhou HL, Zhou ZH. Interoceptive aberrations in major depressive disorder: Neural mechanisms, clinical correlates, and targeted interventions. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 124324 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.124324]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We sincerely thank the editorial team, peer reviewers, and production staff of the World Journal of Psychiatry for their professional support and assistance throughout the publication process. The constructive feedback and valuable suggestions from the reviewers and editors helped us improve the quality, clarity, and presentation of our manuscript. We also appreciate the editorial office's patience, timely communication, and careful attention to the details during the proofreading and production stages. Overall, we are grateful for the opportunity to publish our work in the journal and appreciate the team's commitment to maintaining academic quality and publication standards. We look forward to future opportunities to contribute to the journal.